Dear Marvel Comics, Why Can’t We Just Be Friends?

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Isaiah says:

    At least in the online world, it seems like Marvel is in the unenviable position of knowing its their game to lose. Especially with the double-edged sword of giving Stan Lee’s “true believers'” access to all of their digital library with one amount, I can only imagine it will make things more “interesting” financially, but Marvel might be in a unique and wonderful position because the company is branching out pretty effectively into other mediums. The best example of that might be found through how admirable they’ve been in producing their own properties’ films. That seems to contrast with DC who may now be dominating the “pulp comic” market, but is having mixed success in expanding its brand in other areas. The story may ultimately turn on which company, or, hmm, cartel of companies, is best able to transition its properties into other mediums, especially if the digital revolution grows. It’s an amazing things for customers and the struggling artist-writer who gives up on submitting their work and just rolls up their sleeves to create an interesting web-comic because its cheap and offers a way for the creator to have control over the property and whatever income it generates, but it may be sharpening that knife’s edge larger companies have to walk along just because publishing could bring in a lot less income if fans are free to look at all of their library for a flat rate. So if inter-publisher libraries began to show up online, I wouldn’t be surprised if mergers between those publishers were close behind on that same horizon. Though that might better integrate the properties and create those moments of cooperation, even if it won’t be thanks to, say, Batman and Spawn being friends, so much as wacky roommates when the lineup of Image has to move into the Wayne family mansion. In which case, I can easily imagine Batman muttering, “boy, I thought I was grim” with his gravelly Christian Bale voice when he sees Spawn brooding on his roof yet again. Either that or wondering if his house is a home for runaway emo and scene girls, as I just perused through Image’s current library and it looks like the Image formula about women is, “Suicide Girl+arbitrary power=superheroine”.

  2. The Image/DC thing is a strange conundrum, eh? Marvel sometimes gets its hands on other properties, but doesn’t really integrate them into Marvel continuity. DC’s policy on this has been a lot more fluid. Sometimes, the characters make full transitions (Such as Captain Marvel and Blue Beetle) where you never would have guessed the character didn’t officially begin in the DC universe. Image isn’t really a universe, so much, as a conglomeration of comic book companies owned by their original creators. I’m pretty sure DC can’t buy Image… or if it did, it would only have access to the logo, and not much else. What you mention, though, is kind of happening anyway, since DC owns Wildstorm Comics, originally printed under Images label, and are transitioning those characters in right now While Spawn (who belongs to Todd McFarlane Studios, not Jim Lee’s old company) ins’t hanging out at Wayne Mansion, Grunge from Gen13 could be found playing video games with Robin, and The Question (originally from Charlton, mind you) can be picking up on a trail that Zealot and Grifter left behind while hunting Daemonites.

    From the point of view of someone who doesn’t read DC, I find this all to be rather exciting, but confusing. I’m used to a comic book universe that builds on top of itself, instead of branches out, absorbs, then reinvents itself. You would think that the whole reinventing itself shtick would mean that DC would be the market leader. Evidently, no. Marvel represents 45% of all the money in comic books, while DC represents 33%. Considering all the properties that DC has access, and DCs willingness to experiment, that seems low.

    I do wonder if this willingness to recreate themselves has hurt DC more than helped them. In the short run, they get to be the exact type of comic book company for the exact audience they perceive exists right now. In the long run, however… actions in the DC Universe are chosen based upon whether it’s healthy for selling comic books this decade, and, I would assume, at this point, very little thought is put into the legacy of DC in the future. Why bother? The universe will just right itself every 10 or so years anyway. Every decision made in Marvel, however, has an unwritten scrutiny examining it asking “What will this look like in fifteen years? You know… because we’ll still be building stories on it later, so will this story make sense to us then? Could this be an unintended embarrassment?” I know that point of view is a simplification of the story… but there’s a sense of truthiness about it that I can’t put down.

Leave a Reply